What is the expense ratio of IWF vs IWM?

IWF has an expense ratio of 0.18%, while IWM has an expense ratio of 0.19%.

IWF vs IWM

iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF vs iShares Russell 2000 ETF

Last updated: 2026-04-02

IWF iShares

iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF) is an exchange-traded fund issued by iShares that provides exposure to large-cap U.S. growth stocks with above-average earnings potential. It charges a moderate expense ratio of 0.18%. The fund offers a modest dividend yield of 0.39%. Launched in 2000, the fund has a 26-year track record.

AUM: $108.0B ER: 0.18% Yield: 0.39% Since: May 22, 2000

IWM iShares

iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) is an exchange-traded fund issued by iShares that provides exposure to small-cap U.S. equities with higher growth potential and volatility. It charges a moderate expense ratio of 0.19%. The fund offers a moderate dividend yield of 1.02%. Launched in 2000, the fund has a 26-year track record.

AUM: $69.0B ER: 0.19% Yield: 1.02% Since: May 22, 2000

Quick Verdict

Both funds have nearly identical expense ratios (0.18% vs 0.19%), so fees are not a differentiator here. Over the past year, IWM has significantly outperformed with a 25.1% return vs 18.2%. Income investors may prefer IWM for its higher yield (1.0% vs 0.4%).

Key Metrics

Metric	IWF	IWM
Expense Ratio	0.18%	0.19%
Dividend Yield	0.4%	1.0%
Fund Family	iShares	iShares
Category	US Large Cap Growth	US Small Cap

Performance Chart

Indexed to 100 at start (5-year comparison)

IWF +71.3%

IWM +10.9%

Performance Comparison

Period	IWF	IWM	Difference
1 Month	-4.73%	-5.40%	+0.67%
3 Months	-8.83%	+0.31%	-9.14%
6 Months	-8.48%	+1.52%	-10.00%
YTD	-8.83%	+0.31%	-9.14%
1 Year	+18.20%	+25.09%	-6.89%
3 Years	+75.80%	+39.83%	+35.97%
5 Years	+71.26%	+10.93%	+60.33%

Fee Impact Over Time

Estimated fee cost difference assuming 8% annual returns

Investment	Period	IWF Fees	IWM Fees	You Save
$10.000	10 years	$357	$377	$20
$10.000	20 years	$1.529	$1.613	$84
$10.000	30 years	$4.912	$5.178	$266
$50.000	10 years	$1.786	$1.884	$98
$50.000	30 years	$24.558	$25.888	$1.330
$100.000	30 years	$49.116	$51.776	$2.660

Risk Metrics

Based on 5 years of daily returns

Metric	IWF	IWM
Annualized Volatility	21.4%	22.6%
Max Drawdown	-33.1%	-33.1%
Sharpe Ratio	0.40	0.01

Dividend Comparison

Metric	IWF	IWM
Annual Dividend (per share)	$1.69	$2.54
Dividend Yield	0.39%	1.02%
Distribution Frequency	Quarterly	Quarterly

Top Holdings

0 of top 9 holdings overlap (0% overlap in top holdings)

IWF Top Holdings

Name	Weight
NVIDIA CorporationNVDA	12.82%
Apple Inc.AAPL	11.79%
Microsoft CorporationMSFT	8.78%
Broadcom Inc.AVGO	4.81%
Amazon.com, Inc.AMZN	4.61%
Tesla, Inc.TSLA	3.57%
Meta Platforms, Inc.META	3.28%
Alphabet Inc.GOOG	2.83%
Eli Lilly and CompanyLLY	2.62%

IWM Top Holdings

Name	Weight
Bloom Energy CorporationBE	1.01%
FabrinetFN	0.69%
Nextpower Inc.NXT	0.61%
COEUR MINING INCCDE.NE	0.60%
EchoStar CorporationSATS	0.54%
Credo Technology Group Holding LtdCRDO	0.53%
Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.KTOS	0.45%
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.STRL	0.43%
Advanced Energy Industries, Inc.AEIS	0.41%
Hecla Mining CompanyHL	0.39%

Which One Should You Choose?

Choose IWM if...

recent performance momentum matters to your strategy. Note that past performance doesn't guarantee future results.

Choose IWM if...

you prioritize dividend income and want higher regular distributions from your portfolio.

Related Comparisons

AGG vs IWF AGG vs IWM BND vs IWF BNDX vs IWF DGRO vs IWF DGRO vs IWM DVY vs IWF DVY vs IWM