ETF Versus

IWM vs VONV

iShares Russell 2000 ETF vs Vanguard Russell 1000 Value Index Fund ETF Shares

Last updated: 2026-04-02

IWM

iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) is an exchange-traded fund that provides exposure to small-cap U.S. equities with higher growth potential and volatility. Launched in 2000, the fund has a 26-year track record.

AUM: N/A ER: N/A Yield: N/A Since: 2000-05-26

Vanguard Russell 1000 Value Index Fund ETF Shares (VONV) is an exchange-traded fund that provides exposure to large-cap U.S. value stocks trading at below-market valuations. Launched in 2010, the fund has a 16-year track record.

AUM: N/A ER: N/A Yield: N/A Since: 2010-09-22

Quick Verdict

Over the past year, IWM has significantly outperformed with a 23.1% return vs 13.5%.

Key Metrics

Metric IWM VONV
Expense Ratio N/A N/A
Dividend Yield N/A N/A
Fund Family N/A N/A
Category US Small Cap US Large Cap Value

Performance Chart

Indexed to 100 at start (5-year comparison)

70 86 102 118 134 150 2021-04 2022-06 2023-09 2024-12 2026-04
IWM +10.9%
VONV +39.4%

Performance Comparison

Period IWM VONV Difference
1 Month -3.73% -3.32% -0.41%
3 Months +0.31% +1.28% -0.97%
6 Months +1.11% +4.67% -3.56%
YTD +0.31% +1.28% -0.97%
1 Year +23.14% +13.48% +9.66%
3 Years +39.83% +40.36% -0.53%
5 Years +10.93% +39.42% -28.49%

Fee Impact Over Time

Estimated fee cost difference assuming 8% annual returns

Investment Period IWM Fees VONV Fees You Save
$10,000 10 years $0 $0 $0
$10,000 20 years $0 $0 $0
$10,000 30 years $0 $0 $0
$50,000 10 years $0 $0 $0
$50,000 30 years $0 $0 $0
$100,000 30 years $0 $0 $0

Risk Metrics

Based on 5 years of daily returns

Metric IWM VONV
Annualized Volatility 22.6% 14.8%
Max Drawdown -33.1% -20.2%
Sharpe Ratio 0.01 0.22

Dividend Comparison

Metric IWM VONV
Annual Dividend (per share) $2.54 $1.71
Dividend Yield 1.02% 1.81%
Distribution Frequency Quarterly Quarterly

Which One Should You Choose?

Choose IWM if...

recent performance momentum matters to your strategy. Note that past performance doesn't guarantee future results.

Related Comparisons