ETF Versus

QQQM vs SPYV

Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF vs State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF

Last updated: 2026-04-02

Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) is an exchange-traded fund that provides exposure to large-cap U.S. growth stocks with above-average earnings potential. Launched in 2020, the fund has a 6-year track record.

AUM: N/A ER: N/A Yield: N/A Since: 2020-10-13

State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) is an exchange-traded fund that provides exposure to large-cap U.S. value stocks trading at below-market valuations. Launched in 2000, the fund has a 26-year track record.

AUM: N/A ER: N/A Yield: N/A Since: 2000-10-02

Quick Verdict

Over the past year, QQQM has significantly outperformed with a 22.7% return vs 10.5%.

Key Metrics

Metric QQQM SPYV
Expense Ratio N/A N/A
Dividend Yield N/A N/A
Fund Family N/A N/A
Category US Large Cap Growth US Large Cap Value

Performance Chart

Indexed to 100 at start (5-year comparison)

75 99 123 147 171 195 2021-04 2022-06 2023-09 2024-12 2026-04
QQQM +76.8%
SPYV +47.1%

Performance Comparison

Period QQQM SPYV Difference
1 Month -2.89% -3.87% +0.98%
3 Months -4.70% -0.54% -4.16%
6 Months -3.84% +1.51% -5.35%
YTD -4.70% -0.54% -4.16%
1 Year +22.74% +10.47% +12.27%
3 Years +82.72% +39.05% +43.67%
5 Years +76.76% +47.10% +29.66%

Fee Impact Over Time

Estimated fee cost difference assuming 8% annual returns

Investment Period QQQM Fees SPYV Fees You Save
$10,000 10 years $0 $0 $0
$10,000 20 years $0 $0 $0
$10,000 30 years $0 $0 $0
$50,000 10 years $0 $0 $0
$50,000 30 years $0 $0 $0
$100,000 30 years $0 $0 $0

Risk Metrics

Based on 5 years of daily returns

Metric QQQM SPYV
Annualized Volatility 22.2% 14.4%
Max Drawdown -35.6% -19.1%
Sharpe Ratio 0.42 0.30

Dividend Comparison

Metric QQQM SPYV
Annual Dividend (per share) $1.27 $1.03
Dividend Yield 0.53% 1.82%
Distribution Frequency Quarterly Quarterly

Which One Should You Choose?

Choose QQQM if...

recent performance momentum matters to your strategy. Note that past performance doesn't guarantee future results.

Related Comparisons