ETF Versus

SPTM vs VONV

State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF vs Vanguard Russell 1000 Value Index Fund ETF Shares

Last updated: 2026-04-02

State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) is an exchange-traded fund that provides exposure to the total U.S. stock market across all capitalizations. Launched in 2000, the fund has a 26-year track record.

AUM: N/A ER: N/A Yield: N/A Since: 2000-10-10

Vanguard Russell 1000 Value Index Fund ETF Shares (VONV) is an exchange-traded fund that provides exposure to large-cap U.S. value stocks trading at below-market valuations. Launched in 2010, the fund has a 16-year track record.

AUM: N/A ER: N/A Yield: N/A Since: 2010-09-22

Quick Verdict

SPTM has edged ahead over the past year (15.9% vs 13.5%).

Key Metrics

Metric SPTM VONV
Expense Ratio N/A N/A
Dividend Yield N/A N/A
Fund Family N/A N/A
Category US Total Market US Large Cap Value

Performance Chart

Indexed to 100 at start (5-year comparison)

85 102 119 136 153 170 2021-04 2022-06 2023-09 2024-12 2026-04
SPTM +58.0%
VONV +39.4%

Performance Comparison

Period SPTM VONV Difference
1 Month -3.76% -3.32% -0.44%
3 Months -3.66% +1.28% -4.94%
6 Months -2.04% +4.67% -6.71%
YTD -3.66% +1.28% -4.94%
1 Year +15.90% +13.48% +2.42%
3 Years +57.40% +40.36% +17.04%
5 Years +57.96% +39.42% +18.54%

Fee Impact Over Time

Estimated fee cost difference assuming 8% annual returns

Investment Period SPTM Fees VONV Fees You Save
$10,000 10 years $0 $0 $0
$10,000 20 years $0 $0 $0
$10,000 30 years $0 $0 $0
$50,000 10 years $0 $0 $0
$50,000 30 years $0 $0 $0
$100,000 30 years $0 $0 $0

Risk Metrics

Based on 5 years of daily returns

Metric SPTM VONV
Annualized Volatility 16.9% 14.8%
Max Drawdown -25.0% -20.2%
Sharpe Ratio 0.36 0.22

Dividend Comparison

Metric SPTM VONV
Annual Dividend (per share) $0.95 $1.71
Dividend Yield 1.19% 1.81%
Distribution Frequency Quarterly Quarterly

Which One Should You Choose?

Choose SPTM if...

recent performance momentum matters to your strategy. Note that past performance doesn't guarantee future results.

Related Comparisons